Hi LordOdin, I meant your system is very fast compare to a Titan+GTX780.
Btw. my i5 need < 5 seconds to start the render.
Cheers, mib
Hi LordOdin, I meant your system is very fast compare to a Titan+GTX780.
Btw. my i5 need < 5 seconds to start the render.
Cheers, mib
OS: Windows 8.1 64bit
GPU: 4x GTX Titan Black
Time: 02:22.
With regard to eklein’s suggestion about tile size, I actually reversed it to 320x200. I’ve tried other configurations and this seems to be the quickest.
Fikey,
I made a mistake in my previous post the ideal tile size should be “200x360” not 200x320. The tile size 200x360 fits evenly into the resolution of 800x720 so their is no partial rendering of tiles. The x tile size of 200 is better than 400 because with multiple GPU’s each GPU has less waiting before it can render the next tile.
On my 2 x GXT 780 OC the tile size of 320x200 or the default of 256x256 gave a time of 4:18.15 with the tile size of 200x360 I got 3:59.76.
OS: Linux Mint 17.1
GPU: MSI GTX 980 - stock speeds
Blender 2.73
Time: 07:16.48
Edited to add more info
980 + 460 Time: 05:40.73
This is surprising?
@eklein, interessting but we can change other settings to get faster rendering too.
Every benchmark make only sense when all use the same settings, how good or bad they are.
Same is with overclocking or liquid nitrogen cooling.
@Grimm, yes, older cards profit from this file, no idea why.
Will ask developer.
Cheers, mib
My FX 8350 needed around 16 so an older AMD CPU would take forever
Hi,
OS Win 7 64bit
GPU: GTX 560 2MB /driver 314
Time: 18:36:02
Something from me:
Os Win 8 64bit
GTX 780ti / driver 347.09
Time: 07.17.98
will try later with GTX 660ti added
cheers.
I tried those settings although reversed them again to 360x200 and got a time of 2:18 so a little bit faster still!
Win 7 64bit
560ti + 750ti
Both: 09:22.54
560ti: 17:40.64
750ti: 16:57.39
Hi Everybody.
I know my Specs are not the best but its my own little baby that i built and still to be honest needs a good upgrade on the GPU part.
I did as was said and loaded the file, went into camera mode and hit F12.
Here is my benchmark & specs:
O.S.: Windows 7 Ultimate x64.
MOBO: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. P8Z77-V LX (LGA1155).
CPU: Intel Core i5 3570K @ 3.40GHz. (Not O.C’ed)
Ivy Bridge 22nm Technology.
GPU: 1023MB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 GDDR5 (ASUStek Computer Inc).
RAM: 16GB.
Blender Version: 2.73
Render Time: 38:39.77
Well that’s my results anyways guys.
I was quite happy actually with the results.
As i was expecting it to come in around about 1 hour or more judging from the results from the better GP’s,
So all in all i’m quite pleased with my results and the render time.
Its the first time i have actually gave my system and Blender a proper benchmark in this regard.
Cheers
mark117h
EDIT:
I’m also going to know i’ve seen some of the render times of the 7 series Ti cards,
Think about saving up and grabbing myself one of those as the times in the thread are impressive with the 7 series Ti’s to be honest.
Hi,
OS: OS X Yosemite
GPU: 2 x GTS 450 1GB (tiles: 200x200, 256x256 didn’t work - out of memory)
TIME: 18:48.46
Ok, just finished building the new rig, not OCed as still waiting for VGA waterblocks…
OS: Windows 10
GFX: 2x 980 GTX g1 gaming
CPU: 5960x
Rendertime: 3:59.71
Hold your dollars the GTX 960 will be out soon xD
Windows 10 x64
GTX 970 + GTX 970 OC
Time 4:17.55
OS: Windows 7 x64 Prof
GPU: GTX 970 4GB G1.Gaming Gigabyte + 2 x GTS 450 1GB
Time: 07:25.80
GPU: GTX 970 4GB G1.Gaming Gigabyte
Time: 08:21.12
A single GTX 980 or a GTX 780 Ti is faster than a GTX 690, which is two 680’s smacked together (albeit at a lower speed). Impressive.
Pretty sure the 690 was a joke lol
Or maybe SLI was active and impaired the render time.