Win 8.1 64 bit
ASUS GTX 780 3GB @ stocks speeds
06:56.84
ASUS GTX 780 3GB OC(core @ 1200, memory @ 6800)
05:39.73
Looks like currently is faster than GTX 970 and prices now are lower or the same.
Windows 8.1 64x
Nvidia GTX 980(OC)
07:08.78
The 970/980 should be quite a bit faster. I assume it’s still not fully supported yet?
Sorry double post.
Windows 7 x64
MSI N580GTX Lightning Xtreme Edition 3 GB
12:51.31
Windows 7 x64
Gigabyte GTX 770 4GB Factory OC (GPU 1137/1189 MHz, Mem 7010 Mhz)
10.17.09
I saw a sign hanging in a racing shop… [Speed = Money - How fast can you afford to go?]
-LP
9:52.10
Windows 8.1 X64
GTX 770 4GB
Windows 8.1
GTX 780 Ti SC
00:03:38.27 v2.71
00:05:23.20 v2.72
Retried my render with a maxwell supported build(http://graphicall.org/444), got a faster time(05:02.07), but the render didn’t work correctly(definitely the gpu, cpu was fine):
Hi shadowlich, could you try a kernel I build a few days ago?
It is build on Linux but iirc kernels are the same on all plattforms.
Rename your sm_52 kernel and copy my kernel instead.
It looks like it does not support volume scatter on GPU with your build.
Cheers, mib
v2.72
Windows 7
GTX 660Ti
12:02.00
@mib2berlin: I downloaded the buildbot and I noticed that while the volume rendered fine now, the kernels used only go up to 5.0(same as the graphicall build), making it look like blender is using the 5.0 for maxwell GPUs. I tried you file(both renaming it to 50 and leaving it as is) and neither worked, giving blank renders. Regardless thanks for the help.
Windows 7
Asus GTX 550Ti
27:27.07
Pity!
The buildbot is linked to the sm_50 kernel, it´s the same as when you rename it.
I think the 970/80 user get better performance with the real sm_52 kernel.
It is a matter of time once they update the Cuda toolkit to the latest version.
Cheers, mib
Windows 7
Asus GTX 550Ti
27:27.07
Ubuntu 14.04
Asus Gtx550Ti
30:08.31
(drivers 331.38)
Ubuntu 14.04
GTX 550Ti
30:06.24
drivers 340.46
Windows 7 x64
GTX 670
11:24.80
GTX 770
10:05.64
Windows 7
GTX Titan (OC)
06:08.42