Cycles 2.7x benchmark CPU only (Fixed link)

Version 2.70
FreeBSD 10-STABLE amd64 r263906
Core i7 3770K 3.5Ghz

Result Time 02:44.48

Blender-2.70-c6d8540-win64-vc12
Win7 Ultimate 64bit
Amd FX 8350 8core 4.0Ghz
06:03:67

An older piece of hardware, but a lot of people are still rocking first-gen quad-core chips. Of course, this wasn’t really quad-core, it was AMD’s slapdash idea of quad-core. Still, for what it’s worth.

Win 7 64-bit SP1
Dual Opteron 8222 3.0Ghz
10:57.51

Blender 2.70 Official
OpenSUSE 13.1 x64
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 @ 2.4Ghz
7:50.55

Blender 2.70 Official
OSX 10.9.2 iMac
Intel Core i5 2.7Ghz
4:57.09

Blender 2.70 (From Blender.org)
Windows 7 Home Premium x64
intel core i7-4770k 3.9 GHz
3:11
min:sec

what clock speed? if you dont know and didnt overclock it i can put the clock speed it comes out of the box down

this is a horrible time i hope you were multitasking or theres something wrong with that blender build

For those who have an intel with Turbo Boost technology, remember to indicate the Turbo frequency, not the maximum base frequency that can be read in the specifications (unless for some reason you have turboboost disabled from the BIOS).
To be sure, would be best if you monitor the frequency with some lightweight monitor app while rendering is active. As I said in a message above, on Linux use “i7z”. cpufreq and widgets do not work well with intel turbo frequency.

Blender 2.70

Windows Server 2012 R2
Intel Xeon E5-2650 x 2 (2x8 cores), 256GB RAM

1:20.34

Impressive, isn’t it? :slight_smile:

I edited my post, sorry I wrote Duo instead of Quad for the Q6600. I just copied and pasted XD. Yes it seems the Xeon’s are worth the money in the long run indeed. Makes me think heavily about my next build. I have had this Q6600 build for quite awhile now. It’s been fast and trusty for a long time. I didn’t realize how much faster the newer chips were until this thread. :frowning: I knew my video card is aging 9800GTX+ 512MB, but I thought my Q6600 would last forever…!

Blender 2.70
Windows 8 Pro
Amd Athlon II x2 240 2.8 Ghz oc
23:57.80

T.T

Not the best pc, but it works :stuck_out_tongue:

¿¿¿256GB??? How?.. Wow…

sonance is that with the default build or the mingw?
if that was the default build try the mingw one. :slight_smile:

Blender 2.70 date: 2014-03-19 05:02 hash: 19e627c
Kubuntu 13.10 64-bit, fully updated
Intel Core i7 4770 stock, factory settings
16 gigs of Kingston 1600 MHz DDR3 10-10-10

2:30:02

If you want to render something in Blender, and not wait too much, Linux really seems to be the way to go.

Official Blender 2.70
Mac Pro 8-Core Xeon E5/OSX 10.9.2
32 GB Memory
(2x) AMD FirePro D700
01:27.22

More fun with old processors. I just ran the benchmark on a single Opteron 2360 SE. It’s impressively faster than my other 8222 setup. I believe that it’s structurally very similar to the first-gen Phenom X4, so anyone running that at a clock rate of 2.4-2.6Ghz (the 9750, 9850, and 9950) should expect these numbers.

Single Opteron 2360 SE: 9:59.26

I’m waiting for a second Opteron to arrive and I’ll post that, too. I suspect that it will be around five minutes. I don’t know why. That number just seems right for some reason.

Spend ten dollars on eBay; double my processing power on my old desktop. Not a bad deal.

Windows 8.1
Intel i5 3570k 3.8 GHz
5:36.87

This is a Dell server :slight_smile:

Yes, it is the default build :slight_smile:

sry cant add this to the list because its better than my time :stuck_out_tongue: